Hardy Weinberg Problems Ap Bio

Coup and Europe

Alessio Mannino

ilribelle.com

While we were (almost ) all at sea, our policy requires us to approve the Lisbon Treaty. From there, much has changed, but still Today, many have no idea of \u200b\u200bthe scope of the event.

note: we are losing almost an absolute national sovereignty. In Europe, if it passed all of the Lisbon Treaty, it is decided in our lives in every way. And decisions would be taken by people who sit on the benches of Europe without the right to do so. Not that the Italians have chosen and sent them there. For now, opposed strongly to the thing, there is only the German Constitutional Court. What about us?

Eurocracy

Save The Date: July 31, 2008, between the applause of members of parliament and government in Italy there was a coup: we also decided not to be a sovereign country in all respects. It was in the summer, people at sea, and after the Senate had approved 23 of that month, the House also adopted "unanimously" a Lisbon treaty, officially filed on 8 August. A referendum, by us, you can not because the Constitution forbids it on matters such as foreign policy. Small detail: we're not talking about foreign affairs, but to our business, because Lisbon is the biggest attack on the freedom of peoples and individuals dall'eurocrazia in power by divine right and not by popular will. From white coup of those days no one has heard anything until October 2 last year, when Ireland, frightened by the crisis and reassured by the promises of the euro-bureaucrats (will not be forced to legalize abortion, they will lose control over taxes, will not see the threat of neutrality) went to the polls for the second time in two years, reversing the fierce no to Europe in June 2008 with a definite yes (67% with a turnout of 58% of those eligible).

First observation: the first was not enough right? Or when the result is contrary to what the government wants to vote has to go back to the bitter end to reverse the popular will? By joining
Irish however, and the recent passing of the mistrust of Poland, to hinder the process of ratification of what will be the de facto Constitution of the European Union today is the Czech Republic led by its recalcitrant president, the poet Vaclav Klaus.

Privacy

And he has good reason. Text2 known as the "Lisbon Treaty" wants to be the cement with which to create legislation to the United States of Europe: a superstate in which the independence of individual nations will be requisitioned by men and institutions based in Strasbourg and Brussels. Whose decisions by ordinary citizens, naturally, will be strictly excluded. Inaugurated the conference Laeken in Belgium in 2001, the process that led to Lisbon is the work of a Convention of essays, chaired by former French President Valery Giscard d'Estaing and Giuliano Amato, who candidly rivendicò3 the choice to produce a mass shapeless and unreadable than 2800 pages full of references, notes and changes to prevent someone, for their part, we understand something. After the sound rejection of the French and Dutch referendums in 2005, was in fact in Lisbon in 2007 that the leaders of twenty-seven European states decided to give the new Magna Carta as the definitive written in secret, signed in secret, the secret content that can not be deciphered by a human being of average intelligence, and let secret thanks to the compliant media that they never explained what momentous changes it entails.
to have done just the first Europeans to have been last minute, or the former communist Eastern Europe (Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Slovenia, Slovakia, Latvia, Lithuania), but also Austria, Denmark, Malta and Portugal . However, apart from Czech Republic, the unknown in clinging to those who care about self-determination from the bottom is represented by Britain, which seems to start changing of the guard at Downing Street between the current prime minister, the Labour Party Gordon Brown, and the conservative David Cameron, whose supporters would even like leaving the system Europe.

Absolute Power

But we get into detail. The Treaty is not a single body and linear, but a monumental series of changes to the two core treaties of the Union: the European Union Treaty (TEU) and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), to which is added The Treaty of Nice in 2003. Enshrines the principle that the laws enacted by the state will be higher than the single European national laws (Declaration 17 and 27). Parliaments must obey the fundamental rule to the interests of Europe before those of their represented (Article 8c TEU). The power of veto of individual states will lose about 68 new areas of supranational jurisdiction. One of these is the border checks, on which the EU will decide by a majority of the flows of entry and exit. In the European Council, any institution of the Presidency, the members of each country will represent the EU in the countries they come from, and not vice versa as has been until now. The Commission, a sort of executive, will increase its power in almost all aspects of life, acquiring one, hideously undemocratic, to legislate by decree. Commissioners of its members, in fact, "Propose" the laws. A vote for them will be the Council of Ministers. Both bodies are not elected but appointed by the government. The Council also will discuss only 15% of Commission proposals, everything else can not do anything but passively endorse.
latter will no longer have one commissioner from each member country, but each office will participate in round only two thirds of the countries, "to which it may happen that a law binding supranational and erase the fact that an Italian law without even an Italian or thought to have discussed the "4. The Parliament will be ousted: shall neither be entitled to the proposal or adoption or rejection autonomous but co-decision (really!) with the Council of Ministers, and, for one thing, he can not even vote on taxes, the historic heart of the popular legitimacy of a state. Example: If MPs want to reject a bill submitted by the Commission will either rip 55% of the votes in the Council of Ministers, or get an absolute majority in its ranks. Which, as we know, is quite understandably tiring as the divisions in Europe, in spite of the groups "popular", "socialist" and "liberals" remain on the crest of national interests, not ideological.

police state

Go ahead. In international politics the super will behave in all respects behave as the U.S. compared to their state government: will sign binding agreements for all its members even if there was someone other hand, will declare war even without UN consent, leaving the a poor individual states 'constructive abstention' (ie non-belligerence pact of steel may not slip out from mainland) and the President of the Union will serve as foreign minister, to which national counterparts will have to give way in relations with Washington, Beijing Moscow. In domestic policy, has strengthened the core of EU origin, namely the single market based on 'free and undistorted competition "(Protocol 6). Without significant distortions, for example, that a State can no longer support a sector of its economy if in distress. Measures to boost the state neo-Keynesian model will be punished. On the whole, the European Central Bank will be located in Frankfurt, in fact, soluta legibus: will be strengthened its role as undisputed master of monetary policy, with no accountability to anything or anyone for its decisions. There is no trace of a specific address on the social and tax, no word on how to finance the meager Social Chapter. Judicial landmark European Court of Justice will be hosted in Luxembourg. What it decide will be stronger than any rule of a State (Art. 344). Which means that you can cancel laws or judgments regularly employed within the borders of a nation breaking up completely autonomous. Even its judges are appointed by governments, and then they will have sewn on the mark policy of who chose them. Finally, the ultimate question: citizenship. In Europe we will be Lisbon Italian, German or French, but "in addition" even the super-citizens (Art. 17b.1 TEC / TFU). First, Europe was considered to be a "kit" being citizens of their country. From now on we will have a dual nationality, with two citizenships. But not equal: where rights and obligations under, say, in Italy were to conflict with those of Europe, the latter will prevail. To understand the gravity of the matter, suffice to say that the pages of the Treaty, crept in the Declaration concerning the explanations of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, the death penalty is permitted "to punish, in accordance with the law, a riot or insurrection '. Understand the concept? We are the justification of police repression.

Hope

Fortunately, there is a German court in Berlin, even in Karlsruhe. A glimmer of hope against tyranny eurocratica comes just from Germany, the heart and engine of the Union. On June 30 this year, the German Constitutional Court has made very heavy reliefs proposed expropriation of sovereignty by the Treaty of Lisbon. First, the European institutions have powers only as delegated to exercise on certain areas of jurisdiction by the States. Second: The supreme court holds sole, as the German Supreme Court, the last word on any of German law goes beyond Europe. It is thus a definite stop right opposite to the European Court. Thirdly, the visit of Karlsruhe calls upon States to hold on areas of action and deliberation the most important, and insists that national parliaments are involved in all cases in which individuals are losing the power of veto. Fourth: if governments do not find room for a significant national democracy within the Union, the Treaty will become unconstitutional, because the Court does not recognize that the European Parliament in Strasbourg, as well as the form of treatment, give full legitimacy to the laws of the Union . Fifth: citizenship "additional" should be additional to national, and not superior to it. Therefore, to safeguard the sovereignty of the Federal Republic, the Court has prohibited the German President to sign the treaty until the parliament of Berlin has not legislated on your right to express an irrepressible on everything being resolved in the palaces Euroland. It asks the Dane Jens-Peter Bonde, a former MEP, "If ... the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty by Germany is considered illegal and in contradiction with the basic democratic principles, the same principle should not apply in all other States that boast the status of democracy? "5.
Europe that wishes to call the citizens and not bankers, multinational corporations, their bureaucrats and their political puppets should do as suggested by a blogger on the site OpenEurope: "Will you do as the United States of America? Their Constitution was understood by all. Fate then ten pages maximum, this treaty. Then do the electors vote for National. Only in this way, with a Constitution that contains the basic provisions you may create an entity capable of surviving the next crisis, and above all get the approval of citizens. All governments are governed by consensus, tacit or explicit, of the governed. And to give such consent in the creation of the European Union means to go looking for trouble "6.
Postilla final this anonymous blogger did not realize that not everyone, but no European government is actually right on the consent of the governed. This is because the national representative democracies are tyrannies of their already masked. So much so that we, for having enthusiastically accepted the monster of Lisbon, has already violated as at least two fundamental articles of the Constitution on which it stands: the first, that "sovereignty belongs to the people", and 11, which condemns the war as an instrument of aggression "and allows" limited sovereignty ", but only if necessary for "peace and justice among nations." Not by decree abolishing the silence-general press.

Notes:
1) "A bipartisan applause accompanied the yes of the House, as the Senate unanimously approved the Treaty ', La Repubblica, July 31, 2008


2) LINK " http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/cg00014.it07.pdf "

3) "It was decided that the document was unreadable ... instead Fosse was understandable, there would be reasons to subject it to a referendum, because it meant that there was something new, "Giuliano Amato, speech at the Center for European Reform in London, July 27, 2007, HYPERLINK" http://www.euobserver.com " www.euobserver.com


4) Paul Barnard," The Treaty of Lisbon. Other than Knight. "September 25, 2009, HYPERLINK" http://www.paolobarnard.info " http://www.paolobarnard.info


5) Jens-Peter Bonde" The ruling of the German Constitutional Court calls upon everyone to take action against the EU's democratic deficit, "July 24, 2009 HYPERLINK" http://www.euobserver.com " www.euobserver.com


6) Cited. Galassi in Luke," Europe, the Treaty of bureaucrats, "October 5, 2009, HYPERLINK" http: / / it.peacereporter.net " http://it.peacereporter.net

Maxine On Birthdays Cartoons

Words words words

In recent times, more than ever I hear ridiculous statements, little thoughts worthy of fifth grade children that they approach timidly to writing and jumbles of crap spewed from mouths that deserve only to be filled with calcite.
Let me begin the review with our (your) justice minister Alfano, who interviewed hot on the case Cucchi could say he had not means of evaluating the whole thing, but that was certainly the excellent work of the police.
In short: he had no instruments, but he was certain.
continue with what Luttazzi, given the recent release quote mandatory of his latest book, called time back as a human being more stupid in the world with Britney Spears (sorry for the tiny ... well, sorry shit!). I speak of course, Carlo Giovanardi, as the train of the breach, when everyone has already said everything except the truth about the case Cucchi, comes like a kick in the balls to remind us that human stupidity and the universe have in common the fact that infinite . Do not digress. The stupidest man in the world has attributed the cause of death for only 42 pounds of Stephen, as if the weight that they go by your body should come out to punch him and bolted leaving broken bones and swollen eyes.
Bravo Carlo, you said your now you can go fuck yourself.
Follows closely the irrepressible Daniel Santanché live on television that gives the pedophile Muhammad, and not being sure that the message is passed, he repeats it for a whole afternoon, sometimes more sometimes less. Too bad the lady to the right of the right to forget that the Greek culture as the Roman, who are our first and most roots of Christian culture, was populated by a sea of \u200b\u200bRecchioni, lusty lesbians and pedophiles petulant.
Brava Daniela, now follow Carlo.
My job with a stick becomes more complicated now that I am going to talk about the ruling of the European Court on the crucifix in classrooms. On this matter were really wasted buckets of words, the claims forcaioli of fundamentalist Christians who live in the Vatican and in the Po Valley, to the timid proposals to maintain low tones of the clash of increasingly bland Democratic Party. By the way, I share the basic idea of \u200b\u200bthe primaries, because it's right to choose their voters how to be unnecessary.
I'm still digressing, fuck.
What I have not heard from anyone, however, is the fact that holding a crucifix in schools means to impart knowledge and try to give parents a culture of the future while recognizing the existence of a different truth and incontrovertible. Teaching to ask questions to understand why things at the same time accepting that there is no absolute truth you can neither understand nor prove, just accept. Keep
crucifixes in courtrooms means the administration of justice by recognizing that there is one that is beyond, different and superior to that of man. And 'all this really acceptable? Or the fact of the matter is once again the black villain who wants to steal us a national identity?
At the end of my speech back in mind the lessons to primary and secondary school of the Italian language, when the teachers, with their damn red pens, painted my sheets every protocol under "another", "we have a home" , "or hungry" and so on. At first glance can be a thing out of place, but in reality were the first times that someone tried to make me understand the importance of words and ability to be able to express, which are two key elements to be and feel free.
Good day to you all.