Purple Washroom Counter

"Tzipi Livni calls for an ethnically pure state of Israel

.
Simone Santini - from www.clarissa.it
- 15/12/2008
the fireworks to begin the campaign in Israel ahead of parliamentary elections to be held next February. The candidate of the centrist Kadima party, Tzipi Livni, former foreign minister of the government led by Ehud Olmert, who was forced to resign for legal problems, during a public meeting with the students reported that, when it is born a Palestinian state alongside of Israel's , "we say to the Palestinian citizens of Israel, what we call the Arabs of Israel: the solution to your aspirations National is located elsewhere. " Livni therefore envisages the creation of two ethnically pure states, or at least this will be the fate of Israel, where they now live as citizens formally in effect, almost a half million Arabs out of a population of about seven. They are the heirs of the Palestinians remained in Israel after the birth of the Jewish state in 1948. The transfer of this population in an Israeli Arab state of Palestine, is the way, according to Livni, to "preserve the democratic and Jewish character of Israel" with the birth, indeed, of "two distinct national entities." The demographic issue has always lived with a lot of concern in Tel Aviv (the birth rate is the only "bomb" in the hands of the Palestinians against the Israelis, "said Yasser Arafat) and hence treated as a matter of national security. The Arab population (by adding the Arabs of the West Bank and Gaza, and the "Arabs of Israel") is overtaking the Jewish population and the trend is only likely to increase as the growth rate is much higher among Palestinians than the Jews, and Israel can not reach most of return flows from the rest of the world as in the first years after the founding of the state.
Two scholars, geographer Arnon Sofer and demographer Sergio Della Pergola (Israeli Italian origins) of the University of Jerusalem, Ariel Sharon's former adviser, have long produced an analysis that can be summarized as follows. Israel will have to solve a problem with three variables: democracy, the Jewishness, the territorial dimension. Only two of these variables may co-exist in Israel in the coming years.
may be a Jewish and democratic state, but he must be of small size. Will be democratic and great, but then no longer be Jewish. Finally, it may be Jewish and extended, but then there will be more democratic.
Livni, therefore, seems to have accepted the idea of \u200b\u200ba democratic and ethnically pure Israel allows its territorial limitation. But even in this case, position raises many perplexities. Ahmed Tibi, one of the leaders of the Arabs of Israel, Member of the Knesset, he wonders if Livni is the position of a line from the election campaign or a very deep conviction.
And in this case asks whether the candidate for prime minister is going to take away the citizenship over one million Arabs and reduce them "without political rights and without national identity," or plans to "transfer" in the territories by force a "Once you create a Palestinian state ?. The position of
Livni had the effect of creating confusion in the deployment of even greater candidate opponent, Benjamin Netanyahu, credited the victory to the polls election.
Netanyahu in fact it difficult to manage within his own party, Likud, the extremist forces. During the recent primary in the party for the choice of candidates, the more nationalist wing and religious leaders have often had the upper hand against the liberal or moderate conservatives.
Many of them have positions similar to those of Livni on the issue of the Jewishness of the state and advocate the ideology of a "Greater Israel", so that Netanyahu could be bypassed and pressure from the right. Especially since there are more than Likud religious parties that look even more extreme solutions for the Palestinians, like their mass exodus from all of Palestine to Jordan. Link
original http://www.megachip.info/modul...artid=8423 "

How Much Does Tgraves Disease Cost

Manifesto Network Eurpoea Public Water

recognize the Charter of Mexico City (joint statement of movements in defense of water) and Nairobi and the participatory approach and unified work that has characterized the Social Forums since their birth.
In particular we want: 1. The recognition and implementation of the human right to drinking water as a right necessary for life. Access water as a universal human right should be included in all constitutions of member countries and in the basic principles and instruments of the European Union. The prepaid water meters should be banned.
2. The exclusion of water from all trade agreements, including treaties of the WTO.
3. The withdrawal of support from the European Commission, European Council and individual European governments at the World Water Forum which is an inappropriate decision-making structure on water. As stated in the resolution of the European Parliament in March 2006, the World Water Council - a private entity without democratic legitimacy - may not have such a strong influence on global policies on water.
4. The recognition by the European Union and member countries that the water is an essential commodity for life and therefore can not be regarded as a commodity to be put on the market. The ownership, management and control of integrated water cycle should be public and participated in social and community level. The principles of public participation - transparency and accountability - must be respected.
5. The guarantee from the European Union and the Member States of the good quality of recognizing that this can only be guaranteed by public scrutiny.
6. A political and financial support for the various forms of public-public partnership through the development of international cooperation and financial resources to ensure access to water, through the exchange of good practices between public enterprises and local authorities on models of participation and solidarity between citizens and communities of different countries and regions, including those suffering the effects of drought.
7. Collective responsibility for the investments needed to ensure safe and sustainable supply of water for all in Europe and the world, accountability should be ensured through general taxation.
8. The prohibition of industrial contracts for the exploitation of the mineral water bottled in order to protect and conserve this resource for future generations.
9. Sustainable management practices that protect the ecology natural cycles of water and maintain water quality in our rivers and groundwater that must be considered as potential drinking water. This management model should also prohibit the construction of large infrastructure projects (dams, river connections, etc..) Financed by public funds that promote the commercialization of water by large corporations.
10. Good working conditions for employees of public water companies. Workers must be integrated into decision-making processes concerning the development of water services.
The European network of public water movement through the work on water, is open to dialogue and cooperate with the movements and networks that are fighting against the privatization of public services and common goods.
Participation and support, network with other continental and progressive forces in Turkey, to counter the World Water Forum World Water Council (Istanbul in March 2009) which will be presented inside and outside the Forum. At the next World Social Forum in Belem (January 2009) proposals and actions to ensure that water will become one of the themes of the worldwide mobilization of all social forums.
Memberships: Italian Forum of Water Movements, Table of Peace and Cooperation of Pontedera, Civic Committee for Water Management Publish the provinces of Agrigento and Palermo - Liberacqua Committee, "Water Prevalle" The Environmental Association Lupus in Fabula, ACCADUEO - Province of Pesaro and Urbino, Territorale Novarese Water Committee, Working Group on Water of Cuneo.

Selling Fake Coach Purses

Mitza isacra nuragica" on Tempiesu "Orune

Simcity 4 Deluce Edition Patch 1.1.638 Patch.

" Peakoilers, now shut up. "

The world is at the center of the most severe financial crisis of our lives. The economic loss incurred so far is already considerable, and we have yet to see the bottom or a turning point. In this context, I suggest that the peak oil community minimize its efforts to awaken the world about dangers of short-term oil production. The reasoning is simple: minimizing our efforts in the short term, do not throw gasoline on a fire that is already burning at full force. We are all aware of how our governments and businesses are confused at this time. Our leaders, future leaders, and intellectuals are seeking ways out of chaos. The public is in a quiet panic mode, those that fared well, now they're doing less well, and their possibilities for action are limited. Those who have lost their jobs and / or home are desperate. Business and markets are in freefall. If awareness of peak oil and its disastrous financial implications were added to the existing mix problems, the trauma would be unthinkable. As many of you, I have dedicated my recent efforts to awaken the public and governments to the impending horrors of peak oil. As this awakening is necessary, keep pushing in this direction may not be in everyone's interest. Many may be tempted to challenge the recent IEA World Energy Outlook. I too am among those who consider themselves very disappointed. But pushed on what can do more harm than good. Continue with your studies and reflections, because helping the world understand the dangers of peak oil is a must. But in the coming months, keep a low profile is the most important task. This is a letter by Robert Hirsch (pictured at the conference Reel Pisa in 2006), a leading expert in energy matters in the world, those who provide information on peak oil published in the Wall Street Journal. I feel unworthy summoned, and before following his advice, quit the blog is dedicated to gardening at the moment to keep a low profile, "I would like to make a few comments. The letter, I apologize for the bad French, I think your an idiot. I do not understand what the point: we should not bother, because there are bigger problems? Just nice of Hirsch do rankings of the problems, especially those placing second under his care for years. We should not cause a national trauma ar? Why, until the day before yesterday's shouting face in the return to the Middle Ages and the apocalypse in an attempt to effectively terrorize! We must not confuse the already confused world leaders? If they have (hopefully) take action is better than well acquainted with the picture ... so often comes to mind to base the New Deal on private mobility or something. And then, he's disappointed by the IEA report? But if this is the first time he says something sensible! In short, the awareness of peak oil and its disastrous financial implications were added to the existing mix of problems, maybe some would be good idea to begin to solve them, I would say. As I suspect that Hirsch wanted to say something else, and she did not. Its justification to advise the discretion are really pulling the hair, and the character is not a fool. Why Hirsch calls so insistently to silence? Comments are open. Even for you, Robert. Debora Billi Source: http://petrolio.blogosfere.it/2008/11/lettera-di-hirsch-ai-peakoilers-siete-daccordo.html Link: http://petrolio.blogosfere.it/